On Hollywood’s (Not-Always) Subtle Homophobia

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


desperate_housewives_gay.gif
The excellent Hollywood biopic, Milk, has unwittingly exposed a subtle form of homophobia–“a post-ironic, post-homophobic homophobia,” as the Washington Post puts it–that remains a fixture of the Hollywood media circuit. Today the Post has compiled a disturbing account of interviews given by male actors who play gay men in the movies, and who are invariably asked by journalists and talk show hosts what it was like to kiss another man (with the obvious subtext: wasn’t it kind of nasty?).

Exhibit A is a conversation between David Letterman and Milk’s James Franco, in which Letterman asks him what he was thinking going into a minute-long kissing scene with Penn:

“I didn’t want to screw it up,” Franco told Letterman.
“See, if it’s me, I kind of hope I do screw it up,” Letterman shot back. “That’s what you want, isn’t it?”
“To screw it up?” Franco asked.
“I mean, do you really want to be good at kissing a guy?” Letterman said as his audience howled with delight.

Even worse was an interview Chris Potter, an actor in Showtime’s Queer as Folk gave to MSNBC: “Soon as they say ‘cut,’ you spit,” he sneered. “You want to go to a strip bar or touch the makeup girls. You feel dirty. It’s a tough job.”

The Post makes the obvious point that female actors who kiss each other always shrug, if they’re even asked about the experience. Personally, I’ve been thinking about the days of Shakespeare, when there were no female actors, and England was ruled by a queen. How did those men approach the job? In some ways, it must have been more normal.

At any rate, this latest Milk froth underscores how there’s still work to be done, even in supposedly gay-friendly quarters. If it has got you angry, consider skipping work today. This morning was the official start of the awesomely-named “Day Without a Gay,” in which gay folk are encouraged to call in sick and spend the day volunteering and organizing “to show our continued commitment to fighting for our rights.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest