New DNA Tech May Allow Cloning, Re-Creating Mammoths

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

600px-Mammoth_mg_2805.jpgHave scientists learned nothing from Jurassic Park? A group of genomicists from Pennsylvania State University published research on their experimental procedure that’s decoded “a large fraction of the mammoth genome,” reports the New York Times. The procedure uses two $500,000 machines to extract genome information from mammoth hair.

Though there is not enough of the genome to totally recreate a mammoth from scratch, the scientists say they could use an elephant cell as a base and then alter it to be more like a mammoths. That cell could then be turned into an embryo and gestated by an elephant and eventually, presumably, born. In another, similar development a few weeks ago, Japanese scientists produced clones from mice that had been dead and frozen for 16 years. The resulting cloned mice survived to adulthood.

Personally, I love the idea of being able to see a real-life mammoth, or some version of it, one day. But it seems a bit silly to work on resurrecting an Ice Age mammal when a quarter of living mammals on this increasingly hot planet are going extinct right now.

Also, I’m not sure I like the idea of scientists playing around with genetics of extinct animals because we don’t really know what would result. Mammoths are fine, but what about saber-tooth tigers? As Steven Spielberg illustrated (albeit, using almost impossible science) in Jurassic Park, when you play with nature, you’re never totally in control. I’m not saying in 10 years we’ll all be running through the jungle hiding from Megistotheriums. I’m just saying nature has its own ways, its own logic, and we may never understand the full complexity of the biochemical processes that turn an egg into an embryo, much less a mutant egg spliced with extinct DNA.

For my money, I’d much rather spend $500,000 on saving the polar bears, or at least their genome, than resurrecting extinct giants.

Picture via Wikimedia Commons.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend