Law and Order on the Trail

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Tonight’s debate on domestic policy will give the presidential candidates an opportunity to address a major domestic issue that hasn’t received much attention from either campaign: Our country’s skyrocketing incarceration rate and the sentencing policies, particularly for nonviolent offenders, that have contributed to it.

We’ve heard surprisingly little on this issue, considering Obama’s legislative work on death penalty reform and Biden’s nearly three decades of tough-on-crime cred (he created the job of “drug czar” during the Reagan administration and wrote the legislation imposing mandatory minimum sentences for possession of crack cocaine, a law he finally moved to overturn earlier this year). McCain’s website indicates he supports more enforcement and stricter sentencing, but the details are vague.

The economy will likely trump all other domestic policy items tonight, but that’s no excuse to ignore criminal justice in light of the quasi-recession. Cash-strapped states started rethinking their incarceration policies even before credit dried up. Now that they can’t even get the money they need for regular municipal operations, maybe it’s time to rethink them again.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest