Goodbye, TV Dinners: New Study Says Technology Improves Family Interactions

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


laptops.jpgThe image of four family members sitting silently around their living room and tapping on their keyboards does not exactly evoke a Norman Rockwell evening. Conventional wisdom has it that everyone in the family is absorbed in his or her own online life—and that the real people in the room are probably not part of it.

But a new report suggests that the situation may be more complex than we think. The internet, after all, is an interactive medium, and using it is not the passive experience of watching television.

The study, conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, found that roughly 95% of married-with-children households—the traditional nuclear families—own at least one cell phone and at least one computer with internet access. That’s compared to around 80% for the country overall. And nearly half the people surveyed said that all the technology actually encourages communication—the “hey, look at this!” phenomenon that makes YouTube so successful.

On the flip side, however, many of those same families reported a decrease in more traditional social activites, such as sharing family dinners or enjoying leisure time.

So the real question, it seems, isn’t whether or not technology-saturated familes communicate with each other: clearly, they do. But what kinds of communication are most valuable? Is watching YouTube videos with your brother or chatting with your daughter for five minutes while she walks to the subway the same as sharing a 45-minute meal?

It’s hard to measure happiness, but the survey does note that a quarter of adults surveyed think they’re closer to their families now than they were when they were growing up. They result may be a new idea of what “family togetherness” means. “Modern nuclear families “are neither isolated individuals nor Dick and Jane’s traditional family,” conclude the researchers. “Rather, their households are active sites of the interplay of individual activity and family togetherness.”

Photo used under a Creative Commons license from Roberta Taylor.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest