Can the Fed Stop a Bank Run?

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The Fed Reserve, in a desperate action this morning to stop a bank run and preserve commercial liquidity, is pouring money into short term markets. As the AP reported an hour ago:

The US Federal Reserve opened up its coffers Tuesday to companies hit by the credit crunch with a new program that will buy up commercial paper, short-term debt critical for many corporate operations.

The latest effort in an all-out war against the credit crunch creates a new “liquidity backstop” for corporate finance and was established after the US Treasury determined it was “necessary to prevent substantial disruptions to the financial markets and the economy,” the central bank said.

“Substantial disruptions to the economy” is a nice way of saying that without access to commercial paper, commerce in the the United States would grind to a halt.

Two days ago, Nouriel Roubini, the respected NYU economics professor, market expert, and editor of the RGE Monitor, had already made these urgent recommendations to stop a liquidity run. In an October 5 interview with the Council on Foreign Relations, Roubini advised the following moves:

* Coordinated interest rate cuts by all major world economies;
* A move by the Federal Reserve to guarantee that it will provide liquidity in the event of any major bank run;
* Increased Fed action to provide short-term liquidity to non-bank actors that lend to corporations;
* A willingness to make short-term loans directly to corporations.

Roubini said that the $700 billion bailout package enacted by Congress last week probably won’t end the crisis of confidence in the financial markets. He notes that the plan does not address the “much more urgent problem” of a “generalized run on the short-term liabilities both of the banks, of the non-bank shadow system, and now of the corporate sector.”

Read the full interview here.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest