World, Shut Your Mouth: The Horror of Public Radio Call-In Shows

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

mojo-photo-calleryells.jpgMuch of the time, public radio is a calm, thoughtful oasis in the fart-joke maelstrom of commercial FM broadcasts. But at a certain point in the daily schedule, most public radio stations suddenly turn from interesting to irritating, filling time with that most lazy and obnoxious of programs: the call-in show. It’s a high-minded ideal, letting the actual public on to “our” radio stations, but unfortunately, in every case, the public that presents itself is yammering and paranoid, either astonishingly bigoted or pathetically whiny, and the shows are unlistenable embarrassments. Why do public stations waste 1/6 of their day on them?

The other day, NPR’s long-running Talk of the Nation attempted to address the issue of gays in the military. One caller drawled that “those people” knew the rules when they joined, so they deserve what they get, while another sobbed through an endless, baffling story about breaking up with her girlfriend or something, and I never figured out if she was actually in the military or not. All these shows are like this: hosts seem frazzled and nervous, dreading each call, stammering interruptions when the monologues get too crazy. And why hasn’t anyone figured out how to signal a caller that they’re now on the air without 60 seconds of am-I-on-yes-you’re-on-do-you-mean-me-yes-go-ahead back-and-forth?

Granted, I’m being a little selfish because of my, er, lifestyle. Here on the West Coast, our NPR live feeds are a little early, and my typically late-night DJ gigs means I often wake up just in time to miss All Things Considered. But why are there so many call-in shows? Local stations have their own versions of the national programs, and let me tell you, there ain’t no conspiracy theorist shut-in like a Bay Area conspiracy theorist shut-in. But the phenomenon crosses all borders: if you thought only Americans could be ignorant and grammar-challenged, check out the BBC’s “World Have Your Say.” A recent topic, a “debate” between the concepts of justice and peace, seemed designed specifically to incite screaming tirades from all corners of the globe.

As a former radio employee, I learned the hard way that callers to the request line were generally, shall we say, a “less erudite” subset of the station’s audience. If I had a nickel for every time a slurring caller requested a song that was already playing at that very moment, and when informed of this seemed unable to comprehend it, I’d have, you know, maybe 40 cents. I suppose it should be obvious: smart people don’t usually want to bellow their opinions on radio call-in shows. So, what should public stations do with those long mid-day hours that they need low-budget programming for? How about they take KCRW‘s lead and throw on some Beck? I’d rather listen to his conspiracy theories any day.

Photo used under a Creative Commons license from Flickr user Katiebate.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend