Journalist Martin Bashir Calls Female Writers ‘Asian Babes’

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


UK journalist Martin Bashir, son of Pakistani immigrants, is best-known for wringing titillating stories from celebs like Princess Diana and Michael Jackson. He’s also kind of a doofus when it comes to racial comments.

At a July 31 address to the Asian American Journalists Association, Bashir said he was “happy to be in the midst of so many Asian babes.” As if that wasn’t bad enough, he continued: “In fact, I’m happy that the podium covers me from the waist down.” A good speech, according to Bashir, should be “like a dress on a beautiful woman—long enough to cover the important parts and short enough to keep your interest—like my colleague Juju’s.” Juju Chang, by the way, is an Emmy-Award-winning 20/20 correspondent who has won national awards for her groundbreaking reporting on transgender and women’s issues and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

I may be only half-Japanese but I’m more than half-offended by Bashir’s comments. The guy has experienced racism in his life, both as a person and a journalist. He knows better. He knows how hard people of all colors work in the field to get to where they are. Perhaps he felt that he was among friends, and that Asian women wouldn’t mind if he threw in a little sexism with his “ha ha, Asians are short” joke. At least he apologized: “Upon reflection, it was a tasteless remark that I now bitterly regret,” he wrote the AAJA. He also apologized to Chang for his “boorishness.”

While it’s admirable that Bashir apologized, Chang’s comment to the audience at the AAJA dinner says it all: “See what I have to put up with?” It’s funny ’cause it’s true.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest