“Celebrity” Wars: More Obama Ad Analysis

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Consider me nonplussed about this new Obama ad. I’m on the record as (1) a believer in the power of positive messages in a “change” environment (i.e. Americans want to see a candidate articulate a new vision); and (2) a nonbeliever in the “celebrity” attack/taunt being used by John McCain.

It’s probably no surprise then that I’m not convinced this new Obama ad — which goes negative on McCain and argues that McCain is the bigger celebrity — is going to work.

This is called being on the defensive. No, I’m not the bigger celebrity. You’re the bigger celebrity! Really, folks? The candidates are each trying to argue that the other is liked by more Americans? I’m obviously not impressed. At least the Obama folks had the good sense to throw in a half dozen shots of McCain embracing Bush — from Obama’s perspective, those images are the spot’s saving grace.

Update: Jonathan Martin of Politico suggests that the celebrity retort is only included to generate media attention, and that the McCain-Bush images are the ad’s real purpose.

Plausible. Interesting.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest