US Strike Killed 47 in Afghan Wedding Party, Investigation Says

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


An investigation released today by the Afghanistan goverment concludes that US forces killed 47 civilians attending a wedding on July 6 near Deh Bala in Nangarhar province. Thirty-nine of the deceased were women and children, who were walking the bride to the groom’s village, as is traditional. The bride was among those killed, said the nine-man investigative team, who relied on eye-witness and relatives’ accounts. “They were all civilians and had no links with Taliban or al Qaeda,” the head of the investigation told Agence France Presse.

The DOD has so far maintained that there were no women or children present during the attack and that only militants were killed. US forces “killed an unknown number of militants yesterday in a precision airstrike aimed at a large group of enemy fighters on a mountain range in the Deh Bala district of Nangarhar,” a DOD press release said. It is still unclear whether the US will launch its own investigation into the attack, but the Afghani team plans to formally disclose its findings to president Hamid Karzai within days.

US military officials are, however, looking into a separate incident that occured on July 4. In that attack, 17 Afghanis were killed and nine wounded. According to Afghanistan defense ministry official Mohammed Amin, all of those killed in the July 4 bombing were also civilians. “All I can say is that any loss of innocent life is tragic,” a US military spokesman told Reuters. “I can assure you that civilians are never targeted in operations and that our forces go to great lengths in avoiding civilian casualties.”

Sadly, this is not the first time a wedding party has been mistaken for a band of militants. An eerily similar incident occured in Iraq in 2004. Twenty-seven people in a wedding party, mostly women and children, were killed. In this case the AP had video of the wedding, and a reporter recognized some of the deceased from the wedding video and from clothes they were wearing. Despite that, US military officials maintained the deceased were insurgents.

As we’ve reported before, civilian casualties are nothing new to this administration. The only thing that puzzles me is how military commanders classify civilians vs. insurgents. If unarmed women and children attending a wedding are called militants, who exactly are we supposed to be protecting in Afghanistan?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest