Inappropriations: Your Tax Dollars at Rest

You’re familiar with federal budget earmarks, but have you heard of “reverse earmarks”? Below, some of the items your tax dollars aren’t allowed to pay for this year.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Last December, Congress got around to finishing the federal budget. In addition to the usual raft of earmarks, tucked into the final 1,400-plus-page spending bill were scores of blind items that specify where its $555 billion can’t go. The reverse earmarks ranged from the aggressively anti-pork (targeting the cdc‘s rec room) to the symbolic (cutting funding for torture) to the downright weird (attempting to block anyone from claiming Montana’s unofficial state motto, inserted by Big Sky Senator Max Baucus). Here are some of the things your tax dollars aren’t supposed to pay for in 2008:

Currency Conversion: “None of the funds appropriated in this Act…may be used to redesign the $1 Federal Reserve note.”

Little Green Men: “…any research, development, or demonstration activities related exclusively to the human exploration of Mars.”

Motto Theft: “…to register, issue, transfer, or enforce any trademark of the phrase ‘Last Best Place.'”

epa Pseudoscience: “…to disseminate scientific information that is deliberately false or misleading.”

Prison Flicks: “…to purchase cable television services, to rent or purchase videocassettes, videocassette recorders, or other audiovisual or electronic equipment used primarily for recreational purposes [in federal prisons].”

People Patents: “…to issue patents on claims directed to or encompassing a human organism.”

Taking the Gloves Off: “…to support or justify the use of torture by any official or contract employee of the United States Government.”

Idle Interns: “…to eliminate guided tours of the United States Capitol which are led by employees and interns of offices of Members of Congress and other offices of the House of Representatives and Senate.”

Giant Junkets: “…to send or otherwise pay for the attendance of more than 50 employees from a Federal department or agency at any single conference occurring outside the United States.”

High Times: “…any activity that promotes the legalization of any drug or other substance included in schedule I of the schedules of controlled substances.”

Chinese Chicken: “…allowing poultry products to be imported into the United States from the People’s Republic of China.”

Ron Paul’s Pet Peeve: “…to make any assessed contribution or voluntary payment of the United States to the United Nations if the United Nations implements or imposes any taxation on any United States persons.”

The Next Armstrong Williams: “…to produce any prepackaged news story intended for broadcast or distribution in the United States [unless there’s a disclaimer].”

An Outbreak of Relaxation: “…to provide additional rotating pastel lights, zero-gravity chairs, or dry-heat saunas for [the Centers for Disease Control] fitness center.”

Old Glory Condom

And in case you were wondering where the money must go, the budget requires all federal condom funds to be used “only for the procurement of condoms manufactured in the United States.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest