The Science of Gayness: Does it Really Matter?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

As California same-sex couples lined up to get married, so did the protesters. But more and more, the battle over homosexuality has moved from the social studies department to the biology classroom. A study published this week showed that gay men and straight women’s brains are symmetrical, while straight men and lesbians’ brains are asymmetrical. Also, gay men and straight women’s amygdalas (the part ruling aggression and fear) have similar connective patterns.

So what does this mean? According to the lead researcher, Ivanka Savic, it’s “robust” proof that there are biological differences between gays and heterosexuals. But even Savic admits that the study can’t tell whether these differences are genetic or the result of the fetus getting too much or too little testosterone while developing in the womb.

Truth is, we still don’t know what (if anything) actually causes gayness. And even if there is a genetic “switch” that makes a kid gay or straight, for females, it doesn’t really seem to matter. Women, as we’ve reported earlier, have a habit of sliding through a few sexual orientations throughout their lifetimes. One study tracked 79 women who described themselves as “non-heterosexual.” After 10 years, 30% of the subjects were lesbian, 29% were bisexual, 22% wouldn’t label themselves and 7% were straight. And even those that identified as lesbian occasionally slept with men.

Some right-wingers are supporting the scientific pursuit of a gay gene in hopes that it could be fixed before birth. Aside from the questionable ethical implications about such a pre-birth intervention, to me the search seems moot. Even if there is a “gay” gene, I doubt that having it would mean that one would be definitely, 100% gay. Some people have the gene for Type 2 diabetes but because of environmental factors will never develop the condition. A gay gene could work in similarly, and inevitably, some people will be gay despite lacking the gene. And while we’re looking for genes, what about the bisexual gene or the transgender gene?

Science may answer some questions, but it’s not going to tell us exactly why some people are gay. And it’s definitely not going to tell us whether they should be able to get married.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend