Full Coverage of the Missing White House Emails Story

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Obama’s Big Transparency Test
(May 15, 2009)

Dems Tread Lightly on Obama Oversight
(March 19, 2009)

Is Obama CCing Bush?
(February 23, 2009)

Darrell Issa Suddenly Believes White House Emails Should Be Preserved
(February 19, 2009)

Judge to Bush Admin: “You Rolled the Dice…and You Lost”
(January 15, 2009)

Judge to Bush Administration: Preserve Your Emails
(January 14, 2009)

Court Smacks Down Bush Administration in White House Emails Case
(November 10, 2008)

What Was gwb@whitehouse.gov Really Up To?
(September/October 2008)

Court: White House Doesn’t Have To Release Documents Relating to Missing Emails
(June 17, 2008)

White House Admits It’s Missing Email Backup Tapes From Beginning of Iraq War
(May 6, 2008)

White House Emails and The Case of the Missing BlackBerrys
(April 28, 2008)

Preserving White House Emails… Eventually
(April 16, 2008)

Darrell Issa’s Software Error
(March 31, 2008)

White House Destroyed Hard Drives That May Have Contained Missing Emails
(March 24, 2008)

New Deadline in Missing WH Emails Case
(March 18, 2008)

More Answers in the Missing Email Caper
(February 26, 2008)

The Continued Absurdity of the Missing White House Emails Case
(February 11, 2008)

Analysis Shows Possible Pattern in Missing White House Emails
(January 25, 2008)

White House: What Missing Emails?
(January 17, 2008)

White House ‘Recycled’ Backups of its Email Records
(January 16, 2008)

Still M.I.A.: Millions of White House Emails
(January 10, 2008)

On the Attack: Are the Dems Moving Toward A Contempt Vote?
(November 29, 2007)

Bush White House Outdoes Rose Mary Woods
(October 29, 2007)

RE: Those Missing White House Emails
(April 13, 2007)

The Emails the White House Doesn’t Want You to See
(March 30, 2007)


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend