Sen. Feinstein Kills Off False Iran Report

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The office of Senator Dianne Feinstein has weighed in to kill off once and for all a false report that appeared in Asia Times earlier this week that claimed she had been briefed about planned air strikes on Iran. The report is “plain wrong,” Feinstein’s spokesman said.

“Sen. Feinstein has not received any briefing classified or unclassified from the administration about any plans to strike Iran,” Scott Gerber, a spokesman for the California Democrat, told me today. “And we’re seeking a correction to the Asia Times report.”

As I reported yesterday, Asia Times ran an article Tuesday saying “Bush plans air strikes” on Iran by August: “After receiving secret briefings on the planned air strike,” the outlet reported, “Senator Diane Feinstein, Democrat of California, and Senator Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana, said they would write a New York Times op-ed piece ‘within days’, the source said last week, to express their opposition.”

Yesterday, I reported that Senator Lugar’s spokesman had called the report flat out untrue. Lugar “wasn’t briefed, there’s no oped,” Lugar spokesman Andy Fischer told Mother Jones.

Today, Feinstein’s spokesman called the report “plain wrong” and “irresponsible.” He also said that the original story’s writer had apparently not contacted the office to confirm or deny the anonymously sourced report.

Gerber reiterated that Feinstein, a ranking member of the Senate Intelligence committee, remains a strong advocate for pursuing diplomacy with Iran.

With the amount of misinformation and bogus rumors on this issue swirling around these days, Washington is starting to feel a bit like the Middle East. But for those who believe you can’t be too paranoid about a trigger happy administration, isn’t the risk of losing one’s credibility crying wolf prematurely obvious?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest