Apple Ready to Bow Down to Record Labels?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


mojo-photo-applecrushed.jpgWith a 3G iPhone apparently around the corner, the NY Times is reporting that Apple may be more willing than ever to negotiate with record labels in exchange for, well, more stuff you can buy on your iPhone. Apple wants more ringtones and “ringback” songs (music you hear when you call somebody, which by the way is really annoying), as well as the ability to sell songs from iTunes right over the phone network. Currently, you can shop at iTunes on an iPhone only via WiFi or connecting to a computer.

After the jump: how much would you pay for Colbie Caillat?

Bargaining has been a mixed bag for Apple lately; while record labels seemingly lost the battle for variable song pricing (all tracks remain 99 cents), TV networks have been more aggressive: NBC famously dumped iTunes to go on dates with Amazon and Fox, and HBO recently broke iTunes’ $1.99-per-show barrier, with episodes of “Rome,” “Deadwood” and “The Sopranos” going for $2.99 each. Jeez, a couple of those every month and you might as well just get HBO on that box thing across from your couch, what was it called again?

Record labels’ demands for variable pricing seem more bothersome, however, since they hope to up the price of popular recordings (that Rihanna track will be $34 please) while clearing out the MP3 warehouse by lowering prices on forgotten hits of yesteryear (get your Hawkwind tracks here, 10 for a dollar). Apple’s been right to resist that: the user-friendly simplicity of “a dollar per song” is part of what makes iTunes so popular. Universal, specifically, is lobbying for a subscription service, which seems even worse: imagine your iPhone coming locked in with a year of whatever crap Universal Music puts out. Now, if Apple could arrange a Merge subscription, maybe we’d have something there.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest