SXSW Dispatch: Why Lou Reed Hates Mp3s

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

reed.jpgLou Reed reminds me a little bit of my grandmother. He’s old, he’s got bad posture and a New York accent, and he’s a little pessimistic. But if you stick around long enough, he’ll offer up some keen insight and make you laugh.

The rock singer-songwriter/guitarist, during a SXSW keynote speech at Austin’s convention center Thursday, told a packed house that his favorite movie is The Bourne Ultimatum. Why? Because of the fight scenes.

Aggression seems to be a recurring theme for Reed. “Punk is aggressive, steel, street, action. All that young guy stuff,” he said. “Where else is it gonna go? It’s [music] or jail.” He later became more self-reflective about his attitude and his music, adding, “I have a B.A. in dope. And a PhD in soul.”

A few things to know about Reed, if you don’t already. At one point or another, he was a copy reader for a divorce lawyer, a package wrapper at Doubleday, and a mover. After studying film and acting, he decided music was his thing. “I basically started writing monologues with music. It was such a simple idea, I don’t know if it even constitutes being an idea.” He makes self-deprecating comments like this a lot.

Lastly, and most importantly, Reed openly disses the mp3 format of distributing, exchanging, and selling music. “Technology is making it easy to make things worse,” he sighed. “Look at the way YouTube looks. It’s like, hey, here’s a movie the size of a stamp. And here’s music reduced to a pin drop; reduced to a crazy zoo animal.” In case you’re confused, he’s pissed at how mp3s reduce the size of music files to easily manageable, but crappy sounding, songs.

In short, Reed’s kind of a badass that doesn’t seem to care much what people—specifically record executives—think about him or his music. He’s more interested in writing a “musical monologue” than a follow-up to his (arguably) biggest commercial hit, “Walk on the Wild Side.”

Is he grumpy? Yeah, a little. But he’s also pretty honest, and frequently whips out great little doozies like this one: “I’ve never understood how songs get written. If I did, I’d have a ‘Son of the Wild Side’ and an island in the Caribbean.”

—Gary Moskowitz


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend