Justice Department Approves XM-Sirius Merger

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


mojo-photo-xmsirius.gifIn the latest example of two wrongs desperately hoping to make a right, satellite radio rivals XM and Sirius are one step closer to blissful orbital matrimony as the Justice Department has approved the companies’ merger. It still has to get past the FCC, but Justice accepted the networks’ argument that HD radio, iPods and, uh, player pianos constitute adequate competition in the face of what sure looks like a monopoly to anyone with eyes. Assistant attorney general Thomas O. Barnett laughs off your suspicions, though:

In several important segments of their business, with or without the merger, the parties simply do not compete today and therefore the merger would not be eliminating any competition between them.

Right, so can Apple and Microsoft merge, because people can just use typewriters and read magazines? Hooray!

Despite the fact that Sirius is headed by my creepy former boss at CBS radio, Mel Karmazin, his company has always been my favorite of the two: Howard Stern is as funny as ever, and the delayed broadcast of BBC Radio 1 is like pure crack cocaine to an anglophile like myself. Plus, again, full disclosure, their Boombox channel 34 asked me to do a guest mix once. In comparison, XM’s roster of lowest-common-denominator non-radio celebs like Oprah Winfrey and Willie Nelson probably seemed like good ideas at board meetings, but don’t necessarily make for good radio. Their stock prices are the inverse of my opinions, however, with XM nearing $14 and Sirius up above $3 after news of the approval emerged.

What would a combo Xirius network look like? Well, first of all, it might let you choose what stations to subscribe to (and pay for), if FCC chairman Kevin Martin has his way; the NY Times says he is “thought to support… the creation of a so-called a la carte system of pricing.” You mean I wouldn’t have to pay for 80 sports channels or Sunny 24: Soft Pop Oldies, and I could just go straight to Boneyard 41: Hair Bands? Okay, maybe this merger’s not so bad.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest