Virgin Atlantic Biofuel Test a “Vital Breakthrough,” Says Branson

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


I wrote last month of Sir Richard Branson‘s conversion to the cause of environmentalism and his quest to develop a biofuel to power Virgin Atlantic’s fleet of commercial aircraft. The much-hyped test flight of a Boeing 747 between London and Amsterdam finally went off over the weekend. Despite widespread speculation as to the type of fuel to be used (more than 20 different feedstocks were considered, everything from canola oil to pond scum), the flight relied on a blend of oils extracted from Brazilian babassu nuts and coconuts to provide 20 percent of the test flight’s power.

Branson proclaimed the flight to be a resounding success and a huge step forward in cleaning up the world’s skies. “This pioneering flight will enable those of us who are serious about reducing our carbon emissions to go on developing the fuels of the future,” he said.

But, as Branson is learning, environmentalists are a tough crowd to please. Doug Parr, chief scientist at Greenpeace, called the Virgin Atlantic flight a “high-altitude greenwash,” saying that only the reduction of air traffic and a slowing of airport expansion will have a real impact on carbon emissions. Both, to put it mildly, are unlikely. Meanwhile, Kenneth Richter at Friends of the Earth labeled Branson’s test flight a “gimmick” and claimed that “biofuels do very little to reduce emissions.”

So that’s how we reward big business when it tries something new? I say cheer up, fellas! The truth is that aviation-related carbon emissions are a relatively tiny contributor to global greenhouse emissions, about two percent today and, at current growth, about three percent by 2050, according to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The fact that Branson is even bothering to invest in cleaner fuels (not to mention cleaner-burning aircraft in the form of Boeing 787 Dreamliners) is something that merits encouragement, not derision. A publicity stunt? Maybe. Virgin is a corporation operating in a free market, after all. But if it’s a stunt, it’s one that at least promises to enliven debate about how we’ll power our world when the wells run dry.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend