Study: Anything With a Beat Causes Sexism

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

mojo-photo-eminem.jpgVia, it’s a study that appears to connect hip-hop to sexism, but not in the way you’d expect. Political science professors at North Carolina State University placed male and female students in three groups. One listened to Eminem’s “Kill You” (representing the “misogynist” team: “Slut, you think I won’t choke no whore/
’til the vocal cords don’t work in her throat no more?”), the second listened to the Beastie Boys’ “Sabotage” (representing absence of misogyny: “I’m-a set it straight, this Watergate”) and the third group “was not exposed to rap music.” So did they play them Josh Groban, or just sit them in a quiet room? It doesn’t say. Anyway, the study concluded that hip-hop music made people more sexist, no matter what the lyrics were about:

Men in the first group, exposed to overtly sexist Hip-Hop lyrics, via Eminem’s “Kill You,” and the second group, exposed to Beastie Boys’ “Sabotage,” a song without any misogynistic lyrics, expressed stronger sexist attitudes after exposure to the music than those in the control group, which was not exposed to rap music at all. “It’s like hearing the word ‘chocolate’ and suddenly having a craving for a candy bar,” said [researcher] Dr. Michael Cobb. “Sexism is embedded in the culture we live in and hearing rap music can spontaneously activate pre-existing awareness of sexist beliefs. Rap music, fairly or unfairly, has become associated with misogyny, and even minimal exposure to it can automatically activate these mental associations and increase their application, at least temporarily. … In the absence of explicitly sexist language, the negative associations with rap music are still being primed,” explains Cobb. “In this case, however, the receiver is unaware that this process is taking place and therefore to inhibit their reactions. When women listened to Eminem, however, the blatant misogyny is startling to them and it triggers a more careful interpretation and rejection of the premises in the song. Males, who are not the targets, are not as motivated to recognize the mechanisms at work.”

So they’re saying that even female-appreciating (or, uh, ignoring) hip-hop raises sexist attitudes because it reminds you of all the other misogynist hip-hop? Can I even say “hip-hop”? Yikes. Even though the artists they’re using are, coincidentally enough, lily-white, and the researchers said the study proved “rap does not cause sexism,” there’s something creepy about the conclusion: hip-hop just sounds kinda sexist. It makes me wonder if anti-hip-hop campaigns will now focus on the music, not the lyrics; it’ll be just like that old anti-rave “No Repetitive Beats” law! And, conversely, how much dreamy folk music and wonky indie rock is masking vile sexism behind its apparently innocuous musical facade? We need more studies!

Photo courtesy Interscope


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend