Lost Focuses on Plot, But Ploddingly So

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


claire-aaron-and-sun.jpgAfter last week‘s action-packed, mind-bending episode of Lost, I had high hopes for this week’s installment. I hoped that there would be allusions to physical laws, mathmatical theories, and the theory of relativity. Or that the series, which is now a blogged about by the Washington Post and has legions of intricately-researched fan sites, would give me some new twist to investigate. So did it? Eh, not so much.

The plot did move along, though, in a way it didn’t in the last season. But it felt like the writers were simply going through the motions, dutifully moving the plot along, without having much fun along the way.

But, the show’s creators, true to their word, did answer questions. They showed us that Claire’s baby Aaron makes it off the island, possibly making him one of the Oceanic Six, and that John Locke, the former employee of a box company, is a serious bad-ass. Locke’s putting a live grenade in a captive’s mouth and having him hold down the pin with his teeth is a tactic even veteran interrogator Sayid would approve of.

There were also some nuanced allusions to the time lag on the island and its other special properties, which I had hoped for more of. There is a reference to the film Hugo watches, Xanadu, which emphasizes the idea the island is in its own space/time bubble. While Hugo watches the movie, Sawyer is reading The Invention of Morel, a novel about a man on an island who creates a machine capable of reproducing reality (a reference to the “magic box” that reproduced Locke’s father on the island).

One more nuanced, but notable visual clue to future plot points was Aaron’s survival off the island. It reminded me of what the Australian psychic said to Claire before she got on flight 815: “It is crucial that you raise this child yourself.” Aaron may be little, but my prediction is he’s going to be a huge part of this season’s plotline.

Photo courtesy of ABC

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest