Candidates Earn Their Hipster Cred

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

deadhead-obama-200.jpgWalking home from work earlier this week, I came across a ginormous crowd outside San Francisco’s Warfield Theater waiting to attend a “Deadheads For Obama” show. Patchouli hung heavy in the air, and radios played jam-band music while eager fans waited to get inside and hear members of the Grateful Dead rock out.

Maybe I live in a cave or something, but I had no idea that the deadhead scene had become politically engaged, let alone caught Obama fever. But they’re not the only ones endorsing candidates:

Hip-hop icon Russell Simmons spoke out against Obama, after the senator claimed that hip-hop lyrics were to blame for Don Imus’ racist rant, and instead gave a thumbs up to Kucinich, who also was endorsed by System of a Down’s lead singer Serj Tankian.

Despite the Simmons diss, Obama’s managed to align himself with arguably more important celebs such as rappers Kanye West and Jay-Z. As my Riff cohort Party Ben pointed out, the Arcade Fire, despite their Canadian-ness, are also on the Obama train, along with folk singer Joan Baez, Dave Matthews and Robert DeNiro, and Wilco and Bright Eyes.

Camp Hillary is getting love from rapper 50 Cent and Perez Hilton, and Quincy Jones, Madonna, Jon Bon Jovi and Tony Bennett.

If these endorsements are any indication, Obama is notches above Clinton in hipster points. But do endorsements from famous people really help? One study says not so much, and while a handful of bloggers (including myself) poke fun at celebs’ presidential picks, we’re still taking notice. And let’s face it, when the Grateful Dead (sans Jerry Garcia) gets “fired up” to vote for Obama and tells a sold-out crowd of die-hard fans to do the same, it must count for something. Obama may prefer his ’60s and ’70s soul tunes, but a deadhead vote is as good as any other.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend