97.5 Million People Bored by Super Bowl Until Last Three Minutes

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

FootballThe overnight ratings are in, and initial figures show that not only was last night’s Super Bowl the most watched Super Bowl ever, it was in fact the second most watched television event in history. Its 97.5 million number is bested only by the 106 million who apparently watched the 1983 finale of M*A*S*H. I never liked that show.

While the last three minutes of the game did make up for it, the first 17 hours (or so) of the broadcast were pretty dull, and not only because of the actual game: the commercials were terrible. The New York Times went far too easy on them—I mean, how can you call that talking-baby E*Trade spot “amusing”? More like “utterly horrifying.” Most ads seemed aimed to shock, or just gross you out—I don’t think even SF’s bear community wants to see a fat guy with jumper cables on his nipples, and a giant spider eating a cute little firefly does not inspire me to look at your job listings website. Pepsi’s commercials are always terrible, but these were barely watchable: the Timberlake-magnet one was only good for the 7 milliseconds Andy Samberg was on the screen, and the “What is Love” spot was just sad, like anyone even remembers that old “SNL” sketch. Some new drink product was illustrated by dancing lizards, in another jaw-droppingly stupid ad, but at least it was accompanied by “Thriller,” a song whose apparent revival I noted here a while back. I will say I kinda liked the screaming animals spot (was that for a car?) and I’d watch Will Ferrell read the phone book.

But what’s this? People are asking if Tom Petty lip-synched during the half-time show? Say it ain’t so, Tom! You’re telling me you can’t manage utterly zombified, coma-inducing performances of your biggest hits without the help of a backup vocal track? Sources aren’t giving very reassuring answers: an NFL spokesman told the Dallas News “you might want to talk to Petty’s people,” and Petty’s people said they had “no idea” if there was any pre-recorded material. Well, lip-synched or not, at least we still had guitar-as-penis visuals, just like last year. Hooray?


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend