Banksy Wall Gets $400,000 Bid, Remains Terrible

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Banksy in LondonIn the latest twist in the career of British “art prankster” Banksy, a wall on which he painted another one of his one-note eye-rollers has brought £208,100 at auction, or around $400,000. The wall, on the side of a building on Portobello Road in London, will have to be removed to be enjoyed at home by the buyer, and the cost of removal is not included in the price. The artwork depicts a stereotypical artist, with bow-tie and paint palette, putting the finishing touches with a brush on a sloppy “Banksy” tag that has clearly been spray-painted. Har, har: it sure pokes fun at all those people who take art seriously!

Banksy in the Left BankThe artist’s recent work on Israel’s West Bank barrier raised eyebrows and caused controversy, but lost in the debate was the plain fact that it features the same old Highlights magazine-level groan-worthy clichés. Most are trompe l’oeil “breaks” or “windows” in the wall, and boy, everybody loves trompe l’oeil: it’s like a magical illusion! Plus, um, it really brings to the foreground the true “wallness” of the wall itself. Ugh. The auction of the London painting shows that the Banksy phenomenon is just even more of an example of the emptiness of celebrity culture than it supposedly parodies, and considering there are about 100 stunning examples of mind-bendingly great graffiti within a block of my house, shockingly-colored phrases twisted into illegible psychedelic shapes, nearly vibrating with life, it seems like any one of these anonymous artists would be more deserving of some of that $400,000. But clearly I’m not the target audience.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest