Sheehan Campaign Sees Opening, Going To ‘Hit Hard’ On Torture Issue

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


sheehan3.jpg

Right from the time Cindy Sheehan announced her independent Congressional run against Nancy Pelosi, there was an obvious tactical problem: her big lines of attack—the Democrats’ failure to impeach the president or effect any policy shift on Iraq—were less about Pelosi herself (who had voted against the war, after all) and more about the Democrats in general. Those criticisms would inevitably be deflected with the “we just don’t have the votes” refrain. But with Sunday’s Washington Post report that in 2002 Pelosi was “given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites” and its “harsh” interrogation techniques, the Sheehan campaign has been handed a big new line of attack, one that’s inescapably about Pelosi’s own conduct.

Then-Rep. Porter Goss, who was also at the briefing, told the Post that “the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement.” Pelosi hasn’t come up with a reasonable explanation for her failure to speak out against torture when it might have actually mattered. She issued a short statement insisting that legal counsel had concluded “the techniques were legal.” A Pelosi aide claimed that the Post report was “overblown.”

Cindy Sheehan’s campaign is on it. “We really plan to hit this hard and not let it go,” spokeswoman Tiffany Burns told me yesterday.

“This is one of the key reasons why Pelosi has taken impeachment off the table, because she’s complicit in the Bush Administration’s crimes,” Burns said. Sheehan added in a press release:

“Nancy Pelosi and other members of Congress should be using their Constitutional authority to end all use of torture. Acquiring information through use of torture on prisoners of war is as inhumane as it is unreliable.”

If I were working at the Sheehan campaign, I would be calling every political reporter in the city and pushing hard to introduce a very simple question into the news cycle: Do Bay Area progressives want to support a Speaker of the House who is personally complicit in the Bush Administration’s torture policies?

—Justin Elliott

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest