Appeals Court Set to Hear “Wardrobe Malfunction” Case

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Wardrobe Malfunction
Hey, did anyone hear about this thing? I don’t remember it getting much coverage. Back in 2004, I guess one of Michael Jackson’s sisters and a Mouseketeer were at the World Series and did a whole song and dance routine where their clothes exploded? It sounds awesome. Honestly, why doesn’t the media report on this stuff? It’s all “blah blah, indepth reporting on the war and our government’s lies.” Yawn. Well, apparently this “wardrobe malfunction” is still working its way through our nation’s court system: today, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia will hear the case of the exposed bazonga.

The FCC originally fined CBS $550,000 for the incident, which, if upheld, would be the largest fine ever against a television broadcaster. CBS appealed, saying that they “did not plan the sole part of the performance the FCC says made it indecent, the ‘costume reveal’.” Right. It seemed like an, er, open-and-shut case, but these days, the FCC’s indecency standards are coming under increasing attack, reports Reuters: two courts in New York have rejected the government’s policies on indecent speech, specifically, “fleeting expletives.” Now there’s a good name for a band.

While the issues work through the courts, the FCC has sat on its hands, or maybe everybody’s just watching their mouths: there have been no proposals of fines since March of 2006. You’re telling me we could have been ripping each other’s clothes off on TV for the last 18 months? Fleeting expletive!

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest