Interview with Andrew Rasiej: Founder of the Personal Democracy Forum and

Founder of the Personal Democracy Forum and <i></i>, former Dean consultant

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Andrew Rasiej: Essentially, open-source politics is the acknowledgement that the citizens of a city, county, state, or country can solve far more problems for themselves than any single elected official. The thing is, the Internet is really a reflection of what exists in the real world but with certain facilities that are more efficient and easier. In political life, an organized minority is always stronger than a disorganized majority. And organizing is easier on the Internet.

Mother Jones: What should candidates be doing that they’re not, and why?

AR: They’re not making authentic video. They think every time a video camera’s pointed at their face it’s television. They still think that the technology department is a separate department in their organization; they don’t realize that technology isn’t a slice of the pie —it’s the pan. Technology affects everything. The pollsters should be using the Internet to do polling, and getting more nuanced information than just calling up people on the phone. I could go on and on. With Internet advertising, political candidates generally rely on consultants who get paid a percentage for recommendations of television buys, and there’s no mechanism for them to get any of their royalties for making recommendations on Internet buys. Therefore they’re pretty much missing an opportunity to use Google, banner ads, blog ads, and other kinds of Internet ad tools to get their message heard.

MJ: Are they also failing to embrace the web due to their fears?

AR: Big ones. They’re terrified.

MJ: Are those fears justified?

AR: Sure, if you’re not transparent.


More Interviews << >> Politics 2.0 Index


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend