Don’t Get GLAAD, Get Mad

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


mojo-photo-glaad.jpgTowleroad points out today that writer Michelangelo Signorile has given the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation some guff on his blog, “The Gist.” The organization has become known for its annual media awards ceremonies, the most recent of which took place Saturday night in Los Angeles. I’ve got nothing against awards shows, I guess, but lately GLAAD’s have started to seem like less like celebrations of still-rare queer representation, and more like opportunities for (apparently?) heterosexual stars to access the gay demographic. Saturday’s honorees included a “vanguard” award to Jennifer Aniston, as well as “outstanding individual episode” of a TV show to “Grey’s Anatomy.” Maybe they were trying to be funny with that last one?

Signorile takes the organization to task for its apparent reluctance to speak out during recent “f-word” slipups, and calls for the awards show to be “halted, or at the very least, radically pared down.” Maybe Signorile is just trying to catch up to Michael Musto, whose recent controversial Out cover story has reignited the “outing” torch. But he has a good point: in a world where celebrities still live in the “glass closet” and homophobic outbursts have little consequence, it seems like there’s a lot more for GLAAD to do besides becoming a “high-priced masseuse” to Hollywood.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest