Dear GOP, You are Not the Party of Lincoln

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Excellent work from Eric Foner of the Nation (via Alternet) in which Foner smacks down the GOP’s recent use of Lincoln quotes on the subject of treason. (Lincoln thought those who don’t support the military should be “exiled or hanged,” the Right claims, incorrectly.) I’ve always thought that any invocation of Lincoln by the Republicans was disingenuous history-twisting at its worst. After all, we’re talking about the man who perhaps did more for African-Americans than any other American being used as a talking point by a party that viciously fought the civil rights movement and to this day uses minority vote-suppression to win elections in close races. “Party of Lincoln,” my rear end. Lincoln technically belonged to the same party as these guys, but that’s where the similarities end.

Anyway, Foner looks at Lincoln’s congressional record pre-presidency and it turns out he was strongly anti-war. He led Congress in protest of James Polk’s war with Mexico, which was sold on false pretenses and was largely “pre-emptive.” There is no doubt that Lincoln would have fought harder than most against the war in Iraq.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest