The State of the President’s Leadership: Bought Off

Don’t be fooled by the policies on health care, renewable energy, and the budget President Bush put forward in yesterday’s State of the Union. Various experts weigh in on the president’s proposals and they are — surprise! — extremely skeptical.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Reports that Bush would moderate his policies to take into account the new Democratic majority in Congress proved ill-founded yesterday when the nation heard George W. Bush’s 2007 State of the Union address. Stubborn as always, Bush stuck to his guns: Health insurance delivered through the private marketplace, with help for the poor in the form of tax deductions. More medical savings accounts. Tort reform to get rid of “junk lawsuits.” In energy, talk about clean coal. Promises to reduce auto emissions — but no standards.

What follows is a thumbnail of some of the reaction to Bush’s speech along with lobby figures prepared by the Center for Responsive Politics.


“A tax deduction for someone in the 15 percent tax bracket only provides $1,125 in tax relief,” said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA. “This means that moderate-income people will still be left with a price tag of thousands of dollars for premiums, to say nothing of the significant additional costs for deductibles and co-payments. This will leave affordable health coverage out of reach for tens of millions of Americans.”

“On the other hand,” Pollack continued, “the proposal provides disproportionately higher tax benefits for people who need help the least. People in the highest tax brackets will receive tax breaks that are more than twice as high as the purported relief for moderate-income workers. Instead of this ill-advised proposal, the President should expand health coverage for the nine million children who are uninsured when Congress reauthorizes the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) later this year.”

“The President’s tax proposal is more about shifting responsibility, rather than sharing the responsibility of our health care system,” says Andrew Stern, president of SEIU. “We should be making sure that everyone has good coverage, not punishing those who already do.”

The relevant lobbies and their donations:

• Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: $17,865,648, 68 percent to Republicans

• Health Professionals: $49,717,325, 63 percent to Republicans

• Accident and Health Insurance: $7,320,915, 68 percent to Republicans


Bush insists on drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge, which is at best just a drop in the bucket for our energy supply. Meanwhile, our dependence on foreign oil continues. As Bush spoke yesterday, the Iraq government readied a new oil law that will place the once nationalized industry into the hands of the international oil companies.

Gas Guzzlers: The president talks about improved mileage rates, but won’t change the law to require them. “The President assumes that fuel economy will increase but fails to order an increase when a 40 mile per gallon standard is the single biggest step we could take to curb global warming and end oil dependence,” says Frances G. Beinecke, president of the Natural Defense Council. “We would be less dubious of the president’s intentions if he had promised to raise the standards instead of assuming that they will rise four percent a year.”

Ethanol: “A lot of it depends on the efficiency with which ethanol is produced,” said Mike Casey, an environmental consultant who in the past worked for the Environmental Working Group, in advance of the speech. “It’s better than imported oil, [but] it’s not the long term [solution]. We can’t base our entire energy policy on it. Here’s what George Bush needs to do tonight: he needs to announce an aggressive initiative to move this country to the alternative sources of energy tomorrow based on technology available today.”

Again, the relevant lobbies and their donations:

• Oil & Gas: $17,576,986, 83 percent to Republicans

• Mining: $4,022,031, 83 percent to Republicans

• Electric Utilities: $14,970,532, 66 percent to Republicans

• Misc. Energy: $3,142,220, 76 percent to Republicans

• Environment: $889,748, 83 percent to Democrats

The Budget:

Even critics give Bush a plus for just mentioning the idea of bringing the budget deficit in line. The president promises a balanced budget in 2012, but as Bob Greenstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out in a press call yesterday, the real problem comes in the following decade. Another game of smoke and mirrors by the administration: the budget situation will actually get worse because Bush wants to make his tax cuts to the rich permanent. Bush says the tax cuts resulted in a robust economy, but Greenstein says the growth is unexceptional.

Again, the lobbies:

• Business Associations: $1,976,248, 84 percent to Republicans

• Labor: $62,599,397, 86 percent to Democrats


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend