New Facts Appear In Tillman Shooting Affair

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The latest inquiry into the friendly fire death of Pat Tillman is scheduled to end in December. However, the Associated Press has studied thousands of pages of documents, conducted a number of interviews, and has uncovered some rather interesting facts:

Staff Sgt. Trevor Alders, one of the shooters, underwent a PRK laser eye procedure not long before the Tillman incident, and his vision was “hazy.” In the absence of “friendly identifying hand signals,” he assumed that both Tillman and an Afghan ally were enemies.

Spc. Steve Elliott described his excitement over seeing rifles, muzzle flashes and “shapes.” Spc. Stephen Ashpole said “he saw two figures, and just aimed where everyone else was shooting.” Squad leader Greg Baker whose vision is 20/20, claims to have tunnel vision. He says he shot at who he thought was the enemy, but who turned out to be the allied Afgan fighter who was giving cover to the American soldiers.

None of the four shooters identified his target before firing, a violation of military training. Tillman’s platoon had also run out of supplies, a condition which could contribute to fatigue and lapses in judgment. The same commander who was reprimanded for his role in the shootings was also responsible for delivering punishment to those in his command who fired the shots.

And there’s even more: According to a field hospital report, someone tried to start Tillman heart with CPR after his head had been partly blown off and his corpse wrapped. Tillman’s body armor and uniform were burned.

“I will not assume his death was accidental or ‘fog of war’,” said Tillman’s father, Patrick Tillman Sr. This is the fourth investigation of the incident, which the Tillman family believes has been repeatedly covered up by the Pentagon.

The AP has many more details, which are available here.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend