Bush Says Administration is “Constantly” Changing Course

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Yesterday, on ABC’s This Week, George Stephanopoulos asked George Bush about the Baker Commission’s recommendation to find an alternative to the two strategies on the table for Iraq–“cut and run” or that of the administration’s long-time coveted tagline “stay the course.” Earlier this month, I wrote about the Baker Commission reporting that splitting Iraq into three sections was the only other alternative. The president told Stephanopolous that the administration has never had a “stay the course” mentality.

We’ve never been ‘stay the course,’ George. We have been — we will complete the mission, we will do our job, and help achieve the goal, but we’re constantly adjusting to tactics. Constantly.

(Read the full transcript here.)

Hmmm…Really? Think Progress provides a great rundown of the many times Bush has drilled “stay the course” jargon into the minds of the American people. Although, no surprise, at other times this has certainly been a chameleon administration, at least when it comes to marketing the war on terror, which has changed names at least 7 times from the “war on terror” to “GWOT” to the “global struggle against the enemies of freedom” to its latest incarnation “the struggle for civilization.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend