Tucker Carlson Defends One of America’s 10 Most Wanted

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Yesterday Tucker Carlson got into a tiff with Utah’s Attorney General Mark Shurtleff over the justification for putting Warren Jeffs on the FBI’s 10 most wanted list. That the polygamist has been charged with first-degree felony rape and has victimized countless women and children doesn’t stop Tucker from defending him.

“A lot of these things are not illegal…to teach animals to kill animals with your bare hands,” for example. He goes on to argue that Jeffs is accused of doing things that are merely “titilating,” adding: “There are 10 spaces on the list, but is this guy one of the 10 most threatening people to America?” Shurtloff points out that he doesn’t have to be a threat to America but a threat to society and to individuals, thousands of them in this case.

Tucker counters: “He’s more threatening than, say, the Islamic radicals huddling in a basement right now figuring ways to blow up airliners? Or people who are working to overthrow the government?” Shurtloff tells him that Osama is on the list, as are child abusers, rapists and the like.

If only Tucker had bothered to vist the FBI’s site he would have seen, too, that there’s a separate list of Most Wanted Terrorists. This list features not 10, but 26 mug shots, making Carlson’s “either/or” argument all the more absurd.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend