Public Opinion Watch: The President’s Sinking Polls

Views of Bush and the Iraq war are hitting new lows.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Article created by The Century Foundation.

In the latest Gallup and CBS News polls, views of Bush and of the Iraq war—now three years old—have hit some startling new lows.

As the USA Today story on the Gallup poll points out:

The latest results show only 36% of those polled saying they “approve” of the way Bush is handling his job. Bush’s previous low was 37%, set last November.

Sixty percent of those polled said they “disapprove” of Bush’s performance. That matches an all-time worst rating hit last November and again two weeks ago.

Democrats have their biggest advantage since 1992 when poll respondents are asked if they favor Democratic or Republican congressional candidates. The spread: Democrats over Republicans 55%—39%, a 16-percentage-point gap.

There’s more in the poll, but let’s dwell on these approval results for a moment. First, when added to other recent poll results, they indicate that Bush’s approval rating has been dropping unusually fast for the last several results. Here is the analysis of political scientist Charles Franklin, as posted on his website, Political Arithmetik (emphasis added):

President Bush’s approval rating fell to 36% in the Gallup poll conducted 3/10–12/06. This was a new low for the President in Gallup’s polling. Disapproval remained unchanged at 60%, with 4% undecided. The addition of the new Gallup data drives my estimated support (the blue line in the figure) to 36.9%, also a new low for President Bush.

Since January 1, 2006 the President’s approval rating has fallen at a rate of 1% every 12.5 days, the most rapid sustained rate of decline in his presidency. Over the entire year of 2005, a particularly bad year for the President, approval declined at a rate of 1% every 29.3 days.

Second, Bush’s falling approval rating appears to be mostly driven by falling ratings among independents and Republicans. Compared to a year ago in the Gallup poll, his rating has fallen only 3 points among Democrats (from 16 percent to 13 percent), but 16 points among GOP identifiers (from 91 percent to 75 percent) and an amazing 23 points among independents (from 46 percent to 23 percent).

Finally, as Gallup and other polls have shown, two-thirds or more of Bush’s disapproval is now strong disapproval and those strong disapprovers generally outnumber strong approvers by more than two to one. In other words, he has far more strong enemies than strong friends in today’s electorate. Political scientist Alan Abramowitz has usefully summarized the considerable electoral implications of this development:

An analysis of National Election Study data on voting patterns in midterm elections between 1982 (when the NES began asking a presidential approval question) and 2004 indicates that voters with strong opinions of the president’s performance are more likely to base their House vote on their opinion of the president than voters with only weak opinions. Moreover, voters with strong negative opinions are by far the most likely to base their House vote on their opinion of the president.

Across these six midterm elections, the average percentage of each group whose House vote was consistent with its opinion of the president’s job performance was as follows:

Strongly approve 72%

Weakly approve 49%

Weakly disapprove 70%

Strongly disapprove 85%

With 44% of the public now strongly disapproving of George Bush’s performance, these results provide further reason to expect substantial Democratic gains in the 2006 midterm elections.

Other results worth noting from the new Gallup poll:

1. A majority (51 percent) now term Bush a “weak president” rather than a strong one (47 percent).

2. The Democrats in Congress now have a 15-point lead over the Republicans on who can do the best job of dealing with the economy (53 percent to 38 percent). The Democrats also have an 8-point lead on who can do the best job of dealing with the situation in Iraq (48 percent to 40 percent) and only a 4-point deficit on dealing with terrorism (in 2003, they had a massive 26-point deficit on this issue).

3. Here’s an interesting one: Gallup gave respondents five choices for what Bush’s presidency would be most remembered for: Iraq, efforts against terrorism, Hurricane Katrina response, Supreme Court appointments, and tax cuts. An overwhelming 64 percent chose Iraq—just 18 percent chose efforts against terrorism. The rest chose Katrina (10 percent), Court appointments (5 percent), and tax cuts (a mere 2 percent).

4. On Iraq, 57 percent now say sending troops to Iraq was a “mistake,” 60 percent say things are going badly there, 67 percent don’t think Bush has a clear plan for handling the situation, and 51 percent think the Bush administration misled the public about whether Iraq had WMDs.

The new CBS News poll also has a great deal about Iraq, some of which makes the Gallup findings look comparatively mild. For example, 54 percent now think Iraq will never become a stable democracy. Moreover, just 28 percent think that, if Iraq does manage to become a stable democracy, the United States will be more safe from terrorism.

As for what is going on there right now, an astounding 71 percent think Iraq is currently experiencing a civil was, with another 13 percent saying that civil war is likely to break out in the near future. And 66 percent think that when Bush talks about how things are going for the United States in Iraq, he makes things sound better than they really are.

In addition, by 54 percent to 41 percent, the public now says the United States should have stayed out of Iraq and, by 70 percent to 25 percent—the most lop-sided result ever—the public says the results of the Iraq war have not been worth the associated costs.

Other findings of note from the poll:

1. Bush’s overall approval rating is still at 34 percent, tied for his worst ever in this poll. His rating on Iraq is 31 percent and his rating on foreign policy is just 30 percent, down 9 points since this January. And his rating on the economy is 35 percent. Only on the campaign against terrorism does he crack the forties, with a 45 percent rating, against 47 percent disapproval.

It’s interesting to note how negative independents are at this point: in every area except terrorism, independents rate Bush not in the thirties but in the twenties, ranging from 24 to 28 percent. That’s a truly toxic place to be with the center of the American electorate.

2. Despite a somewhat higher proportion of the public rating the economy as “good,” those saying the economy is getting worse (39 percent) still far outnumber those saying the economy is getting better (13 percent). In fact, this disproportion is actually worse than it was two months ago.

These findings are so bad it’s tempting to say Bush can’t possibly sink any lower. But with this administration I’ve learned: never say never!


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend