Auditing the Poor

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

David Cay Johnston of the New York Times reported yesterday that the IRS has been freezing tax refunds for hundreds of thousands of poor Americans—most of them involving the EITC, a tax credit for the working poor—by labeling their tax returns “fraudulent.” About 66 percent of the people whose records were frozen were found to be owed all of the money they claimed or more.

Now tax fraud is tax fraud, and it’s nice that the IRS is pursuing it, but tax fraud by the working poor amounts to some $9 billion a year, if that—and many of these supposed “fraud” cases involve people who filled out the wrong form or somehow couldn’t afford a tax accountant to jigger the numbers just right. About 40 percent of low-income Americans have never even heard of the EITC. Meanwhile, as Max Sawicky points out, corporations and wealthy Americans manage to dodge some $340 billion in taxes each year And not surprisingly, the IRS tends to spend a disproportionate amount resources going after the poor, in part because it’s easier—there are fewer lawyers to deal with, the poor tend not to complain, etc.

This partly comes out of the fact that the IRS has become seriously underfunded, especially after taking a beating from the right throughout the ’90s. So the agency has focused more and more on “easier” targets. But what’s happening is also conscious policy. In 2000 House Republicans tried to cut the EITC, which, in the tiny world of small-bore anti-poverty policies, has been one of the most successful. They failed. So instead they decided to use the IRS as a means of attacking the program. And last September, the House Republican Study Committee proposed even more “intensive” audits of EITC filers, although they were apparently uninterested in that $340 billion sitting around. In fact, the IRS won’t even release its “records on how thoroughly [it] audits big corporations and the rich.” Wonder why.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend