Responsibility for What?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

More hurricane “blame game”: the Congressional Research Service, a non-partisan research organization, looked into the question of whether the governor of Louisiana did everything she could to take the “necessary and timely steps needed to secure disaster relief from the federal government.” And the report says… she did. So that undercuts recent White House attempts to use the “chick governor excuse” for the slow response to Katrina, although it certainly doesn’t get the Mayor of New Orleans off the hook — and I suspect he’ll still come out of this looking quite bad. (See, for example, this.)

Meanwhile, there’s not much to say about the president purportedly taking responsibility for the federal government’s response to Katrina this morning. More precisely, he said, “And to the extent that the federal government didn’t fully do its job right, I take responsibility.” Okay, but what does this even mean? To what extent does he think the federal government didn’t fully do its job right? Does he think he should be responsible for appointing largely unqualified GOP operatives to head positions at FEMA? Is he planning to take any action to fix things? Appoint an independent commission to look into the matter? This may well be the first time in memory that Bush has semi-apologized for anything, but it doesn’t really seem all that significant, when it comes down to it.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend