More Finger-Pointing, Please

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


In a post below, Charles points out that it’s not inappropriate to play the blame game over Hurricane Katrina right now. I agree; in fact, it’s entirely necessary, and I’d like to see more of it. Consider this sentence buried at the end of a Times today, without elaboration: “Efforts to add backup power generators to keep them all running during blackouts have been delayed by a lack of federal money.” Okay, so let’s have dollar figures, figure out who’s responsible, and see how many people are affected, so that everyone can know how decisions in Washington can literally make a life-or-death difference. The hurricane will eventually fade from people’s minds; the time to draw the relevant connections is now. It’s possible to offer sympathy for those in New Orleans, donate to the Red Cross, and still figure out why this all happened.

The thing of it is, most of the time when Congress is fiddling with numbers in the budget, it’s impossible for voters to get any firm sense of where money goes, or how it actually impacts people’s lives in real and concrete ways. The Republican-run Congress knows this perfectly well; earlier this year, for instance, the GOP leadership held separate budget votes on cutting taxes and cutting spending, aware that if people got a sense for how tax cuts drain the public coffers, and a sense for where the money goes and how it actually affects real human beings, they might be a little less prone to aspersions cast on “big government” in the abstract. So it goes with Katrina. People need to know exactly how political decisions—like President Bush’s longstanding efforts to dismantle FEMA and stock the agency with political cronies—affect people, and that can best be made clear right now. It’s the only way to have any hope of getting the important policy questions right in the future.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest