Katrina’s Children

Kids displaced by the hurricane shouldn’t be dumped into failing schools.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Article created by The Century Foundation.

While natural disasters are thought of as the quintessential levelers, hitting
rich and poor, and black and white alike, we all now know that government action,
and inaction, have an enormous impact on just who absorbs the brunt of the disaster.
In New Orleans, the government failed the first test of protection, by inadequately
fortifying the city from flooding. It then failed the second test of evacuating
the city, by inadequately providing for the city’s poor and mostly black residents,
who lacked cars to flee and money for hotels. Now, government faces a third
test: how it will handle the schooling of the children who evacuated to other
parts of Louisiana, to neighboring states, and to other parts of the country.

Given all that the children of New Orleans have been through, we ought to do
everything we can to ensure that they receive a high quality education, with
great teachers, active parents, and supportive peers. For the first time in
their lives, thousands of students who had attended struggling high poverty
public schools in New Orleans could be given the opportunity to attend solidly
middle class, high achieving schools. Alternatively, they may be assigned to
the same sort of failing schools they left. Will we take advantage of a unique
opportunity to do well by these children?

On one level, there is encouraging evidence of hospitality, as public and private
schools scrambled to make room for new children. But there are some worrisome
signs as well. The Wall Street Journal reports
today that private schools are opening their doors mostly to sister private
schools. In the Houston area, most of the children of New Orleans will end up
in high-poverty urban schools, rather than in the suburbs, where
better-off students are educated
.

There is a legitimate concern about the capacity of schools to take in large
numbers of new students. But that is what public schools, unlike private schools,
are required to do: take all comers. Under the surface, the real concerns of
parents often center around the economic class of peers. According
to a study
conducted by David Rusk for The Century Foundation, economic
segregation of schools is increasing, with devastating consequences. Although
American public schools are meant to provide equal opportunity to students,
middle class
schools are 24 times as likely
as low income schools to perform at high
academic levels.

The children and families of New Orleans know this all to well. Even before
the hurricane, children in the Orleans Parish school district were in a very
tough situation. New Orleans has often ranked as the nation’s murder capital,
and the schools suffer all the negative effects of poverty. Statewide,
5.7 percent of Louisiana schools were failing to make adequate yearly progress
in 2003-2004; in the Orleans Parish, the figure was 47 percent, eight times
the rate of failure.

Across the country, a growing number of districts have been seeking to address
the problem of economic segregation. From Wake County (Raleigh), North Carolina,
to LaCrosse Wisconsin, to Cambridge, Massachusetts, districts have sought to
reduce the concentrations of poverty, with
very favorable results for students
. Low income children do much better
in middle class schools; in fact, low income students in middle class schools
do better academically than middle class students in low income schools.

If any set of children has purchase on the nation’s conscience, it is the
children of New Orleans who have experienced things no children should have
to go through. They should not now be relocated to high poverty schools that
are plagued by failure. They are citizens not only of New Orleans, but of the
United States, and deserve to be welcomed into America’s middle class schools.
This is a test the government must pass.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest