Is Free Speech Popular?

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The First Amendment Center just released its 2005 “State of the First Amendment” survey, and some of the results are fairly interesting. The headliner here is that 70 percent of Americans are fine with posting the Ten Commandments in government buildings—and 85 percent approve if such a monument is surrounded by “other historical documents”—which doesn’t come as much of a surprise. But other finds include:

  • 63 percent of respondents oppose a constitutional amendment to ban flag-burning, up from 53 percent a year ago. (Good thing Congress is in tune with the popular will on this issue, huh?)
  • 80 percent of respondents want Supreme Court proceedings televised. (Which seems unnecessary, since the transcripts are always available, and there’s a risk that lawyers and judges could start mugging for the camera—but the reasons as to why this shouldn’t be done don’t seem particularly forceful. Most state appellate courts allow it.)
  • 75 percent think students in public school should be allowed to express offensive views. But only 27 percent think students should be allowed to wear t-shirts that offend people. (Huh?)
  • 64 percent endorse increasing fines to $500,000 on broadcasters who “violate government rules” governing content on broadcast television. But 60 percent don’t think those rules should be applied to cable or satellite.
  • Only 23 percent of Americans agreed that “the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees,” which is down from 49 percent after the 9/11 attacks.
  • So that’s encouraging, and should help slow the long inevitable drift towards fascism, eh? Although when you flip some of the results around, they can look disheartening. 25 percent of Americans think that students in public schools should never express any sort of views that might offend others? 40 percent think the government should regulate content on cable and satellite? That’s a lot of people.

    DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

    Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

    It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

    We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

    We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

    It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

    Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

    Signed by Clara Jeffery

    Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

    We Recommend

    Latest