A small victory, a larger defeat

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Saturday afternoon, a district judge temporarily blocked the Pentagon’s transfer of 13 Yemeni detainees from Guantanamo to other countries until the detainees’ lawyers can challenge the transfers in District Court. The presiding judge in the case, Abdah v. Bush, will hear the legal challenge on behalf of the Yemenis on March 24th. This marks a small victory for the legal community representing Guantanamo detainees. If the detainees are sent to other countries (apart from the potential for being further tortured), they would lose the ground they have so far made in their pending legal challenges to being detained by the U.S. in the first place.

Sunday afternoon saw the same judge (Rosemary M. Collyer) ruling in a similar case—John Does 1-570 v. Bush. This case encompasses the Guantanamo detainees who still remain unknown to the legal community. The attorneys requested that Judge Collyer prevent any transfers of detainees until they can obtain legal representation. Collyer refused, claiming that there was not sufficient evidence that the “John Does” were at risk of imminent transfer. I beg to differ. If Pentagon officials are telling the New York Times that they have plans to move over half the prisoners from Guantanamo, it seems a fair bet they’re going to do what they say—especially given the legal pressures bearing down on them (what if the latest Supreme Court appeal turns out in favor of Judge Green’s ruling?). It’s well within the Bush administrations’ interests to make these prisoners disappear before lawyers find them, represent them, and bring the administration long-lasting litigation and bad PR.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend