The Who’s Better Off Game:Management Workers

Think chief executives have had it easy under Bush? Well, you’d be right. And you’d be wrong. The slumping economy has hit management employees head-on. The management boom of the late ’90’s evaporated as companies folded or scaled back. But those managers who survived have seen salaries soar — particularly among the highest-paid executives…

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

So, are management employees better off today than in 2000? Well, yes and no. But mostly yes.

There’s no doubt that managers — particularly chief executives — endured a rough few years early in George W. Bush’s tenure. No, we’re not talking about the financial scandals which have sent so few executives to prison. We’re talking about the death of the late 90’s management boom.

The casualties of that death can be seen across the country: Nearly 130,000 CEO jobs have disappeared since 2000. But the real picture isn’t quite so grisly. Those executives that managed to keep their jobs have made out handsomely. Between 2000 and 20003, CEO salaries skyrocketed. Even adjusted for inflation, CEO’s are making nearly 25 percent more today than they were when George W. Bush took office. And that figure doesn’t account for the huge windfall of the Bush tax cuts. For average filers earning more than $100,000 (the average salary for CEO’s in 2000 was 104,630), the Bush tax cut reduced taxes by nearly 17 percent.

Other managers haven’t fared quite as well as CEO’s. Human resources managers, for instance, have seen a similar hemorrhaging of jobs — between 2000 and 2003, nearly 24 percent of all HR manager jobs were elminated. But they have also seen wages climb — just not as dramatically as their better-paid management colleagues. Human resources managers are earning about 11 percent more today, in real income, than they were in 2000.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend