The Who’s Better Off Game:Food Service Workers

So, why did the Bush administration want to reclassify fast food workers and other restaurant employees as manufacturing workers? Probably because food service employment has defied the national trend — growing at a steady clip since 2000. Of course, that growth means little when wages remain among the lowest in the nation, and real income has actually declined…

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Over the past few years, economic cynics have suggested that the only jobs being created are at fast food joints. They’re wrong. Fast food joints have been cutting jobs. And wages.

Food preparation and serving jobs have evaporated in the weak economy, including those for fast food burger-flippers and order-takers. Between mid 2000 and mid 2003, nearly 117,000 food service workers lost their jobs. And those who remained employed have ended up earning less — about .5 percent less, in real income. What’s more, the average salary for the nation’s 1.65 million food service workers remains among the lowest in the country at just $14,000 a year.

Restaurant managers have done better. Not only have management jobs been created over the past four years — nearly 75,000 between 2000 and 2003 — but wages have increased by more than 3 percent. Still, that wage increase doesn’t go a long way. The average salary for restaurant managers remains at less than $27,000 a year.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend