Irate Iran

Iran takes criticism over its nuclear stonewalling. Even the Europeans are piling on.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

You know your country is internationally isolated when it is being compared — and not favorably — to Libya. And that was only the start of the bad news for Iran at this week’s meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna.

Much to Iran’s disappointment, the United States seems to have secured Western
European countries’ approval of a draft resolution that expresses
“most serious concern” that Iran’s recent declarations about its nuke activity “did not amount to the correct, complete and final picture of Iran’s past and present nuclear

This marks a change of tone. The Europeans are usually much less hard on Iran than is the U.S. And even the U.S. has been pretty upbeat about Iran’s recent cooperation in disclosing its nuclear program and allowing I.A.E.A. inspectors to investigate its facilities.

(The U.S. draft is an implicit retreat from George Bush’s claim that “rogue states” like Iran have heeded the lessons of his “war on terror” — with Saddam Hussein serving as an example — and are mending their ways to avoid
the same from happening to them.)

Nothing but

“an act of [American] bullying and putting pressure on the others,” Pirooz Hosseini, Iran’s
ambassador to the I.A.E.A, said of the draft.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi
threatened that Iran might cease cooperation with the nuclear
watchdog, and rebuked the Europeans for kowtowing to the U.S.:

“We advise the Europeans to respect their obligations and to resist American pressure, otherwise there is
no reason for co-operation to continue.”

Even the
President Mohammad Khatami
confirmed the threat in a call to Russia’s Putin and insisted that the I.A.E.A. must adopt a “realistic policy and not be influenced” by the United

Support for the U.S. draft was secured after the I.A.E.A. presented evidence that Iran’s nuclear facilities
had traces of highly enriched uranium — pure enough to be used to produce nuclear weapons –- and that its
military had been involved in Iran’s supposedly civilian nuclear program. In response, Iran’s Defense
Minister Ali Shamkhani admitted, for the first time, that
the military produced centrifuges to enrich
. Shamkhani insisted that this was done for civilian uses only.
As for the traces of

highly enriched uranium, officials claimed ignorance –- suggesting that it must have been a case of
contamination of imported equipment.

The latest U.S. draft resolution is harshly critical of Iran, though even this was toned down a notch from
the original. The draft was modified to incorporate the

Europeans’ insistence
that Iran must get a pat on the head
for its current cooperation with the I.A.E.A.

The head of the I.A.E.A., Mohamed ElBaradei, expressed concern over
Foreign Minister Kharrazi’s remark
that Iran plans to resume its uranium enrichment program
“when relations with the I.A.E.A. are
normalized.” As

“Iran has been in breach of its [nuclear non-proliferation] obligations for many years and we need to build
confidence. I think suspension is a confidence-building measure and, as I said, Iran needs to do everything
possible right now to create the confidence required.”

At the same time, ElBaradei
praised Iran’s recent cooperation

“Now they [Iranian officials] are cooperating in a very good way with the agency, and I hope we will
continue to get Iran’s cooperation so we can verify that all their programs are exclusively for peaceful

What’s behind the Iranian bluster? It suggests in part that hardline conservatives in Iran have been emboldened by their success in last month’s parliamentary elections. Then, the un-elected Guardian Council –- vested
with the power to rule if laws and politicians conform to Islamic principles –- barred several thousand
reformist politicians from registering as candidates. This prompted a sit-in by liberal parliamentarians,
some of whom urged the voters to boycott the election — a call many of their supporters heeded. The
hard-liners succeeded in recapturing the parliament in an election that was condemned as neither free nor
fair by the international community.

Iran’s hardliners may be playing to nationalist sentiment by showing that Iran is not going to take bullying
from anyone. For conservatives, Iran’s nuclear program is necessary,
legitimate, and a matter of national pride. They also deplore what they denounce as the United States’
double-standard in nuclear and other policies in the Middle East: financing Israel’s nuclear and military
prowess, which they consider the region’s greater threat, while bullying countries like Iran for
pursuing much more moderate nuclear programs.

Whether the confrontation in Vienna will translate into
greater support for the hardline cause among the populace is difficult to tell, especially given that
harassment of the media and reformist candidates is on the rise. That would be a paradoxical result of U.S. policy toward Iran; but then again, U.S. policy toward Iran has never been short on paradox.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend