Document Not Found

Government agencies scramble to take sensitive information off their web sites.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Like others who champion the public’s right to easy access to government information, Gary Bass calls the Internet a “grand experiment in democracy.” But that experiment may have taken a devastating blow following September 11, when agencies scrambled to purge their Web sites of any information that could aid terrorists. In the process, officials removed reams of data that Bass’ OMB Watch and other groups had worked for years to make public.

For a while, visitors to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Web site found it entirely shut down. Pipeline-mapping information, a database of airport-security violations, and most of the Department of Energy’s records on nuclear transports also vanished. The Environmental Protection Agency removed its “community right to know” database–established in 1986 over industry objections–on places where hazardous substances are stored. The move frustrated emergency workers as much as it did potential terrorists, since firefighters and others often use the EPA’s data to assess risks at industrial facilities.

Not all the public information removed from government sites has vanished entirely: Much of it is cached on other sites or is available in harder-to-access paper files at government offices and libraries. Still, no one knows how long the information freeze might last, how it might change what the public has a right to know, or even if it will protect anyone. “Hiding information about the potential risks won’t make them go away,” warns Bass.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend