Activist uses Web to monitor Beijing

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Lu Siqing is one part activist, one part web geek, and one part secret agent. According to the BALTIMORE SUN, Lu runs the Information Center for Human Rights and Democracy, a one-man operation that monitors the Chinese government’s human-rights abuses.

Recent Must Reads

2/8 – Dot-coms behind bars

2/7 – Youth, liberalism ascend in Syria

2/6 – Bad British blood on the loose

2/3 – Society for the prevention of breast humor

For a staff of one, the ICHRD does a lot. Last year, major newspapers and wire services cited the Hong Kong-based center nearly 800 times, on issues that ranged from the government’s treatment of Falun Gong members to the country’s rising unemployment rate. Despite Bejing’s efforts to censor it, Lu’s web site, www.89-64.com, gets 20,000 to 30,000 hits a day.

Using a pager and a cellular phone with a phone number that changes regularly, Lu keeps in contact with activists in mainland China. Lu’s tactics are a little controversial — recently he impersonated a concerned relative in order to get information from a hospital after factory workers clashed with local police — but journalists who use the ICHRD’s reports say that he’s a reliable source.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest