I’d like to give the world a warm Coke

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In an excellent model of online activism, Adbusters magazine and Greenpeace Australia have taken on globe-straddling Coca-Cola over its environmental record — and won. The two groups jointly created COKESPOTLIGHT.ORG, a web site detailing Coca-Cola’s history as one of the world’s worst hydrofluorocarbon (a greenhouse gas) polluters. So many visitors to the site downloaded the “campaign toolkit,” distributed banners and stickers, and called, faxed, mailed or e-mailed Coke’s headquarters to complain, that the multinational company eventually committed to abandon its polluting ways.

Coke has traditionally used refrigeration units and vending machines which emit HFCs, and had planned to do the same at this summer’s Games in Sydney. But Greenpeace has been working with Olympics organizers to make the 2000 Sydney Games the first ever “Green Games,” complete with a ban on all HFC-emitting coolers.

Coke officials eventually met with Greenpeace representatives and introduced a new policy to ween itself off HFC, CFC, and HCFC technologies by the Athens Games in 2004. Said Australia Greenpeace Olympics campaigner Rupert Posner, “Today’s policy change shows that big industry can be made to abandon dirty practices when environmental groups raise the alarm.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend