Cremation, incineration — what’s the dif?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

If your idea of respecting the dead is tossing their body parts in a trash bag and torching them, chances are you either work for the Mafia or a British hospital. The British health secretary has launched an investigation into reports that hospital staff at the King’s Mill center were ordered to dispose of the organs of aborted fetuses and stillborns as clinical waste rather than transporting them to a crematorium, the UK GUARDIAN reports. The allegations follow a similar scandal at Alder Hey hospital in Liverpool, where tissue from about 900 babies and children was stored without their parents’ knowledge.

A hospital mortuary worker blew the whistle on King’s Mill, saying he had been ordered to throw babies’ hearts, brains, and other organs into waste bags and incinerate them. “I honestly believe that the parents of these babies do not realize their baby or part of their baby has been kept in a mortuary storeroom for the last five or six years,” he said.

The hospital’s chief executive claims that his staff has always sent babies to the crematorium, “where they were treated with sensitivity and cremated following a blessing.” Whenever parts of a baby were kept, “the consent of the parents was obtained.” That’s not how it looks, however, on a videotape staff members made in March of their baby-burnings.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend