Closet Kevorkians

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Whether it’s because they’re a compassionate breed or simply in a hurry to hit the golf course, Australian doctors are evidently happy to help their patients die. THE AGE reports that in a national survey, more than one-third of the surgeons who responded said they had, on at least one occasion, administered more medication than was necessary to treat a patient’s symptoms, with the intention of hastening the Grim Reaper’s arrival. And over half of those who admitted speeding a patient’s death said they did so without an explicit request from the patient.

“It quantifies what many people know, that there are doctors out there who are maintaining the facade of providing palliative care, when many of them know the consequences of their treatments with these drugs,” said one euthanasia advocate.

Over half of the almost 1,000 surgeons surveyed said they think there should be laws permitting voluntary euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide. In Australia, doctors can legally increase medication doses in order to reduce pain and suffering, but not if they specifically intend to hasten death.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend