Damn the treaty, full mines ahead!

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


The Pentagon’s latest alternative to conventional land mines is, um, conventional land mines. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH says the new antipersonnel devices include a feature to make them “victim activated” which makes them little different from the notorious civilian killers they’re replacing. “The Pentagon’s alternative to landmines is no alternative at all,” says a Human Rights Watch spokesperson.

The mines’ prototypes have already been tested, and the Pentagon is about to award an engineering contract. Over 500,000 mines may be produced by 2005.

One hundred and thirty seven nations, including every NATO member but Turkey, have signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty. Clinton has said the US would ratify it in 2006 as long as a land mine alternative was developed. Unfortunately, Human Rights Watch notes, the alternatives already developed, like the latest mine-with-an-off-switch version, are themselves banned under the treaty. Alternatives suggested by Human Rights Watch include not using land mines.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest