The War Away From Home

A new wrinkle for veterans of U.S. World War ll internment camps

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In 1988, Congress tried to close one of the darker chapters in U.S. history by passing the Civil Liberties Act. The CLA entitles veterans of the World War II internment camp program — under which the government relocated and imprisoned 120,000 Japanese Americans for the duration of the war — to $20,000 in reparations and a letter of apology from the president. The law also gave camp veterans 10 years to apply for redress.

But the CLA failed to address a little-known fact: The U.S. secretly pressured 13 Latin American countries, including Peru and Panama, to deport 2,264 of their citizens of Japanese descent to the U.S. camps. When these Japanese Latin Americans tried to collect under the CLA, the U.S. told them they were ineligible because they had been in the U.S. during the war as “illegal aliens.”

In 1996, five Japanese Latin American camp veterans filed a class-action lawsuit, and last June, the U.S. agreed to a preliminary settlement under which Japanese Latin Americans would receive $5,000 and a letter of apology. “The issue in the case was whether the Japanese Latin Americans were included in the statute,” says Deputy Associate Attorney General Richard Jerome. “We took the position that they were not.”

Not all Japanese Latin Americans are happy with the deal. Many camp veterans say that in addition to offering less in compensation, the U.S. has stacked the deck against them when it comes to collecting their due.

While the Department of Justice opened a full-time CLA office on the West Coast, distributed information booklets in Japanese communities, and held more than 200 workshops nationwide to publicize the CLA to Japanese Americans, it has done comparatively little to contact their Latin American counterparts.

“The [U.S.] government refused to do anything more than the absolute minimum,” says Paul Mills, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in the class-action suit. “They certainly didn’t go looking for class members, or make their vast information-gathering resources available to us in order to find them on our own.”

The notification efforts were particularly crucial because, while the U.S. argued that the CLA didn’t apply to Japanese Latin Americans, it said the law’s August 10, 1998, deadline did, giving Latin American camp veterans just two months to make a claim. And people who missed the deadline not only missed their chance at payment — they lost their right to protest. In order to appeal the settlement, Japanese Latin Americans must file for redress, and then, in a separate form, opt out. Already, one of the five plaintiffs has done that, filing a lawsuit against the U.S. for breach of trust and initiating another asking for $10 million.

But in the end, all this may be moot. After the settlement becomes final at a November hearing, the U.S. intends to pay Japanese Latin Americans out of the CLA trust fund established in 1988. Since not all Japanese American applications have been processed, the $5.5 million left in the fund may not cover all eligible Japanese Latin Americans. The settlement specifies that Japanese Americans are entitled to redress first.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend