Product Placement

Magnavox Remote Locator (Philips Electronics) .95

Image: Laura Copenhaver

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Sure, remote controls cut out the grueling back-and-forth of in-person channel changing, but the handheld boon has also created a new challenge: “Our research showed that losing remotes was a big problem,” says Stan Veltkamp, general manager of accessories at Philips. “People would end up finding them in their refrigerators, in their couches, everywhere.”

Sensing a need, Philips introduced the Magnavox Remote Locator. Attach a small receiver to the back of your remote, and it trills back its location from up to 30 feet away.

The locator itself is identical in size and shape to a remote, but, says Veltkamp, it has a feature that helps it avoid the remote’s wayward fate: Velcro backing. “You can attach it to anything,” he says.

Veltkamp is aware of the product’s shortcomings. The locator came out two years ago, and “it hasn’t been a great seller.” More people are buying sets with built-in locators, or “rather than pay[ing] $19.95 for a locator,” he says, they “just buy a replacement” — for as little as $8.

Philips has learned a valuable lesson from the Locator’s lost opportunity, says Veltkamp. “People want things to be very simple,” he explains. “You start adding too many options, and they’re just going to get confused.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest