For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Five years ago, when Ron Hayes’ 19-year-old son, Patrick, was working as a grain handler at Showell Farms in De Funiak Springs, Fla., he was assigned the task of “walking down the corn”—scraping the inside walls of the grain bin. As Patrick knocked down the corn, 60 tons of it fell, suffocating him to death.

After an Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigation into Patrick’s death, agency investigators determined that Showell Farms was guilty of six “willful” safety violations and recommended that the company pay more than $500,000 in fines. But OSHA’s area director later reduced the fine to $42,000, citing a lack of clarity about whether OSHA’s standards applied.

Ron Hayes and his family learned of the reduced fines and citations from a local news broadcast—despite repeated requests to OSHA for information. “When I saw it on TV that day,” he recalls, “I was just heartbroken.”

The ordeal inspired Hayes to reform the way OSHA handles cases such as his. He quit his job as an X-ray technician and together with his wife, Dot, founded Families in Grief Hold Together (FIGHT). The group, which helps families who have had similar run-ins with OSHA, has a nationwide network of attorneys available to do pro bono work. Over the past two years, FIGHT has helped more than 300 families in 45 states.

In 1995, OSHA admitted to mishandling Patrick’s case and revised its safety standards for workers in grain elevators and mills. But Hayes has continued to push the agency: After a request for documents relating to Patrick’s death yielded only sanitized copies, Hayes sued OSHA in federal court. A U.S. District Court judge is currently reviewing all 1,030 documents in the case to determine whether any were withheld improperly. (Eugene Seidel, the U.S. attorney representing OSHA, refused to comment on Hayes’ lawsuit.)

A favorable ruling for Hayes could result in OSHA being monitored for the next five years to ensure it complies with information requests. And if the judge rules against him? Hayes says he has approximately 100 families ready to file a class-action suit against OSHA to require the five-year monitoring period. “Pat’s gone,” he says. “But maybe I can save someone else’s kid.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest